Showing posts with label QLD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label QLD. Show all posts

Saturday, 2 February 2013

Vintage Bathing Costumes & Swimwear

French postcard, 1913

More on a summer theme today - a look at swimwear one hundred years ago.  I thought it best to look at the years leading up to 1913, though, just to see the difference, if any.

In the 18th century women wore "bathing gowns" to 'swim', or bathe - long dresses of fabrics that would not become see-through when wet, with weights sewn into the hems so that they would not rise up in the water. Men wore a form-fitting wool garment with long sleeves and legs, like long underwear, which changed a little over the next century.  Not only were they modest, but they protected the wearer from the sun, as suntans were definitely considered unattractive at the time.

Victorian bathing wear
In the 19th century, the woman's two piece suit became common—the two pieces being a gown from shoulder to knees plus a set of trousers with leggings going down to the ankles. Despite this covering, and thanks to Queen Victoria’s example, popular beach resorts often had bathing machines, small wooden sheds on wheels which were pulled by horses into the sea. The ideas was to avoid the exposure of people in swimsuits to the opposite sex, as it was not considered ‘proper to be observed in a bathing costume, and allowed women, to change into their swimming costumes and enter and exit the water discreetly. Often a swimming costume was hired with the machine – usually a "one size fits all" design made from a sturdy fabric, with a loose wrap tunic with tie belt and baggy drawers. Impractical for swimming, they were really just for bathing, or splashing around and getting wet. Large bathing caps were also worn to keep the elaborate bulky hairstyles of the day dry.


 
Do I look good in this? c, 1900

Costumes were hired as many people only went bathing occasionally, maybe on holiday to the coast.  Other couldn't afford special bathing wear, so would wear old nightdresses or long underwear, such as some of the girls in the photo below, taken at the Coolgardie baths in Western Australia in about 1900.

The Coolgardie Baths, c. 1900

It was also considered of vital importance that men and women bathers swam apart, as mixed bathing was frowned upon or banned on most beaches, however in reality many rules were broken. Mixed swimming contests were against the law until 1913, and therefore women swimmers could not compete in the 1908 London Olympics.

Men and a woman with bathing machines in shallow water at a Ostend, 1913, source

With newly fought freedoms for women and dress reform in the early part of the new century, it was not long the question of the standards of dress on beaches was questioned. The accepted attire for lady swimmers in 1895 was a tunic and short knickers, but many women were criticised for being immodestly dress. Stripes were very popular for men and children

Aussie kids ready for a dip, c. 1905
In 1907, Australian swimming athlete Annette Kellerman was arrested for wearing a fitted one-piece swimsuit on the beach in Poland. Annette Kellerman has designed her famous swimsuit to allow for serious athletic swimming, unlike conventional women's swimwear of the period, but it’s form fitting appearance was considered indecent by some, and it also showed her arms, legs and neck. She changed the suit to have long arms and legs and a collar, but still kept the close fit that revealed the shapes underneath. She later starred in several movies, including one about her life, and marketed a line of bathing suits - known as "the Annette Kellerman," considered the most offensive style of swimsuit in the 1920s and the focus of censorship efforts.


Annette Kellerman in her one-piece bathing suit, source
Also in 1907 men’s bathing attire was called into question, with beaches in Sydney calling for men to wear skirts or pants down to their knees for swimming. A protest resulted and men were allowed to wear shorter outfits, as worn by the Surf Lifesaving Clubs throughout Australia.

Bondi Surf Life Saving Club, December 1906


Despite opposition from some groups, the form-fitting style proved popular. It was not long before swimwear started to shrink further. At first arms were exposed and then legs up to mid-thigh. Necklines receded from around the neck down to around the top of the bosom. By 1910 bathing suits no longer camouflaged the contours of the female body. The yards of fabric used in Victorian bathing skirts and bloomers were reduced to show a little more of the figure and to allow for exposure to the sun. New York, as usual, was a step ahead of Australia.

Swimwear from New York, 1906


Women in bathing suits on Collaroy Beach in 1908
 Australia's first women Olympians, swimmers Fanny Durack and Mina Wylie, wore costumes very like those of Annette Kellerman at the Olympics in 1912.

 Fanny Durack and Mina Wylie, 1912
Mina Wylie in 1913

Female surf riders and prone board, circa 1913, Coolangatta, Queensland.

Women in bathing costumes in Pacific Ocean at Moclips, WA on August 23, 1913


Summer 1916

Bathers in New Zealand, 1918
By the 1920s women’s bathing suits were usually still a two-piece garment with a long singlet style top than could be worn over shorts, or tucked in. Fabrics now were finer jersey and flannel, with rubberized silk and satin began to be used. By the mid-1920s Vogue magazine was telling its readers that “the newest thing for the sea is a jersey bathing suit as near a maillot as the unwritten law will permit.”

A mix of styles in 1920
In the early 1920s swimsuits still had to be of a suitable length - and you did get measured!


By the end of the 20s swimsuits, like dresses, were getting shorter and smaller, although still with a lot more fabric than many people wear today.

late 1920s style
Here in North Queensland the only safe way to swim in summer is to wear stinger suits - swimwear that covers your whole body – much like Annettes Kellerman’s suit. Of course new materials, such as lycra, make these much more comfortable than Annette's suit would have been. The bonus is that they also protect you from the sun!

We tend not to wear them, but don't swim if stingers have been found at the beach, but if you are diving off shore from a boat, they are a must.  Just remember, if you do come swimming in North Queensland, they look best in black......but that's just my opinion!

Stinger suits for a Fantasea cruise, Whitsundays

Deb xxx



Tuesday, 29 January 2013

A land of droughts & flooding rains

I’m back from my week in Melbourne, where despite it being hot and dry we had a lovely visit.  As well as visiting family in Melbourne and country Victoria, we went to the museum and the z00 – and saw the baby elephant!   This is as close as I could get.
251
At Mansfield we were only a 100km from bushfires in the alps, and when I left there were more fires along the Hume Highway, the major road from Melbourne to Sydney.  I returned home to Mackay on Sunday to news of floods just to the south in Rockhampton, and further to Bundaberg.  The Lockyer Valley 80 km west of Brisbane, which suffered horribly in the floods of two years ago, is again flooding. The tropical cyclone which skirted Mackay while I was away and brought lots of rain, then moved down the coast and dumped rain all the way down to Sydney.  There is now a state of emergency from Bundaberg all the way down to Grafton in NSW.  Four people have already died.
creek
Lover's Bend at Palm Creek, Ingham, QLD,  in flood from bank to bank 1913 source


Floods have been as much a part of Australian history as bushfire.  Maitland, on the Hunter River in NSW, seems to have suffered more floods than any other town in Australia. Here is a link to a list of notable floods in Australian history (Mackay had a big flood in 2008). Maitland had a large flood in 1913, but also flooded in 1806, 1820, 1832 (7 people died) 1893 (when Brisbane also flooded) , 1930, 1931, 1949, 1950, 1951, 1952, 1955 (when all southern states flooded in August), 1970, 1971, 1996 and 2007 – over 200 altogether since European settlement and 13 higher than the river's normal peak limit of 10.7 metres (35.1 ft) which caused severe devastation.  The 1955 Maitland Flood, or Hunter Valley floods, was the first Australian natural disaster to be broadcast by the media on an international scale and was considered to be one of Australia’s worst floods, until 2011 at least.  Seven thousand buildings and homes were damaged and the flood claimed the lives of 25 people.
Maitland_Flood_1955
A deserted farmhouse in Maitland, during the 1955 flood, source
Here is a Brief Synopsis of the 1913 Flood, from a Souvenir of the Maitland Flood 1913. Rain began on the Tuesday of the preceding week, and continued for several days, being very heavy all along the Hunter Valley. There had been a fresh in the river a week or so before this heavy downpour, and much of the low-lying portions of the district were inundated. Owing to this, the river began to rise almost immediately at Maitland. On Thursday night, word was received from Singleton that the river had attained a height of 47 feet there, and the inhabitants of the lower parts of Maitland began to prepare for the worst. The water rose quickly on Thursday night, and early on Friday Morning, May 16th, had reached 36 feet, and was still rising. The official record says 36 feet 6 inches as the height of the flood, but there are many who claim that the water reached a higher point than that. It is difficult to say, however, as the gauge was washed away. Early on Friday morning, the water began to pour into High Street through a laneway near the Hustlers, as well as through several shops in the vicinity. It rushed down the street at a great rate, and soon had the lower portion submerged.
It also began to trickle over the embankment near the Belmore Bridge, at the rear of Marsh's stables, but, luckily, was discovered in time, and blocked by sand-bags. At about 6.15 a.m., the river overflowed the bank at Oakhampton, and the fire bell was rung to warn those living in the direction the water was traveling. Considerable damage was wrought at Oakhampton.

maitlandwebmedia
From the original held in Cultural Collections, Auchmuty Library, the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Floods are why traditional Queensland houses are built highset.  Unfortunately the fashion now is for low-set brick veneer houses – small air-conditioned boxes, often with carpet – and highset houses are built in underneath.
houses
Mrs Bridge's and Mrs Anthony's houses in floodwaters, West Ingham, during the Flood of 1913 1913 also saw floods in America.
OHdayton-flood1913-4thst
4th Street of Dayton, OH, USA during Great Miami Flood in 1913.
Here's wikipedia:
The Great Dayton Flood of March 1913 flooded Dayton, Ohio, and the surrounding area with water from the Great Miami River, causing the greatest natural disaster in Ohio history. In response, Ohio passed the Vonderheide Act to allow the Ohio state government to form the Miami Conservancy District, one of the first major flood control districts in Ohio and the United States.
fremont-flood
This photograph, taken looking west on State Street in Fremont, shows several men standing in the flooded downtown area.   The Sandusky River rose to 6 feet higher than they had ever been recorded. Some 550 homes were flooded, and approximately 50 of these homes were rendered uninhabitable or were totally destroyed, and four of five bridges washed away.
I hope you are not being affected by flood, or fire, at present.  If you want or are able to help people affected, you can donate here.
As usual, heaps more photos on tumblr.
Stay safe, Deb xx